Φπ (philosophical practice) acts in contrast to the view of the philosopher Jürgen Mittelstaß , who sees the proper center of a philosophical dialogue in that >anthropological< place, where we try to make the differences of the singularity of Alter and of Ego vanish – in processes of gaining knowledge.
Reference to Juergen Mittelstraß, Wissenschaft als Lebensform (Science/Philosophy as a Form of Life), Frankfurt 1982, p. 149
Φπ (philosophical practice) places the singularity of the visitors & the singularity of the Φπ (philosophical practitioner) in the center of dialogical thinking.
See: Thomas Polednitschek, Politischer Sokrates (PPS) , Muenster 2013, p. 5
But do the philosophers Thomas and Juergen refer to the same ? If not, there is no contradiction, but difference. Is this a central point with respect to academic philosophy and Φπ (philosophical practice)?
To participate in the Belgrad Meeting, 14. - 19. 8. 2014
Mail to: aleksandar.fatic@gmail.com
International Conference Philosophical Practice
2 Kommentare:
Interesting...
I found nothing about the next conference on the Internet.
Mr Fatic's site http://aleksandarfatic.net gave also no clues...
Kommentar veröffentlichen